|14th August 2019||Marion Hutchins|
A year ago, when “no-deal” was initially considered as a possibility, the UKUPC worked collaboratively to evaluate risks involved via the range of framework contracts available to universities. We highlighted to our combined consortia membership those areas which we believe presented a low, medium and high risk. Included in the assessment, we detailed the outcome of our communications with suppliers and confirmed their responses to our perceived risks including how they might mitigate tho
To ensure we are able to continue to help universities plan and prepare appropriately, SUPC, together with our fellow UKUPC, have recently revisited this exercise and updated the review with new information and advice from our suppliers.
While we can, and will, continue to support universities on their use of SUPC framework contracts, we recognise the range of products and services you purchase is hugely varied. It’s important for procurement teams to develop a clear picture of their supply chain for all existing contracts and seek to understand which present a higher or lower risk by asking appropriate questions around key topics. Universities should consider currency, staffing, supplies shortages, increased risk of modern slavery, waste impacts, products subject to higher levels of border control, border delay impacts, and how agile suppliers are in a fluctuating market.
If you would like additional information on h0w SUMS division, SUPC, is supporting Brexit readiness from a procurement perspective, please email us at firstname.lastname@example.org.